Why doesn’t propaganda save? If a politician is a loser, he can’t hide behind tons of nice words.

Notes on Propaganda and Propagandists

In any country, the authorities and the opposition have large numbers of full-time propagandists. Immediately, we note that, as a rule, all of them are directly or indirectly supported by citizens’ taxes.

Many people think that the job of propagandists is to persuade people to take the side of those who ordered the propaganda – and vice versa, to refuse to support political opponents. Many sincerely believe that with the help of highly professional propaganda and neurolinguistic programming of all kinds, such as la Arestovich, one can seriously influence people’s beliefs and completely reprogram their attitude towards certain policies or events.

It is remarkable that any government and any opposition thinks this way and therefore invests a lot of money in propaganda and propagandists. Any government thinks that with the help of mass propaganda it is possible to increase the loyalty of the citizens to them and the opposition to reduce this loyalty.

However, all of this is a big mistake. Propaganda cannot create new ideas and new beliefs in people, because the latter is formed on a very broad basis, on the basis of a person’s entire life experience, and is formed over years, if not decades. For example, if megatons of propaganda are put into the heads of Poles that they are friends of Russia, this will not improve the attitude of Poles towards Russians by one million percent. The reverse example also happens.

So what can propaganda and propagandists do?

Propagandists are able to mobilize, activate, revive, awaken, if you wish, and direct their energies in the right direction, the dormant prejudices and stereotypes that have already formed among people.

But propagandists cannot change these prejudices and stereotypes. For example, in the middle of the third year of Poroshenko’s reign, while 70 percent of society had a definite stereotype that the president is a corrupt official, the mass propaganda launched by Petr Alekseevich did not save him from an embarrassing defeat, his “armavir”. “She didn’t give him a single share of the additional percent.

All politicians disastrously exaggerate the importance of propaganda and place false hopes on it. They do not understand that their rating is only influenced by their personal actions, personal behavior, actions or inaction. More precisely, they understand, but everyone thinks that he is personally very smart and can turn society around his finger – as they say, through the raindrops.

So, resorting to the method of analogy, we can say that propaganda plays the same role in society that enzymes that, as you know, accelerate biochemical reactions a thousand or millions of times, play in the human body. So is propaganda. It speeds up people’s reaction to a particular political event.

Source