Topic at the table Electoral reform. And it’s funny how opinions polarize when you generalize on a subject. Obviously, “reducing the budget of political parties” sounds desirable. Cut it down to INE high command, better. The disappearance of a lot of Pluris (a dainty, finger-touched breed) who don’t even have to work to get the popular vote also seems commendable.
However, on closer examination, certain “assurances” can be found that are not easy to detect at first glance. My dear Tatiana Cloutier (ur.who doesn’t get up late anymore) disagrees with the opposition capitalizing NO on the whole proposal. However, he argues that “there are issues that should be discussed.” She, for example, does not really agree with the fact that citizens vote for election consultants.
In another conversation, now with a PAN senator Damian Zepeda, apart from issuing one or another rude comment about Morena and Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador he usually stays cool and talks about what he calls “poisoned apples” as part of a general sentence. As far as polynomials go, their take on the new variant is that they take away 200… but everything else becomes de facto polynomial. Why? Well, because now the vote will not be for a specific person, but for a list of politicians from each party, who, obviously, will be appointed by their own leaders.
I really think that it is unlikely that any of us, my netizens or readers, could name your federal deputy, local or political adviser to your favorite party at this time. So voting for the list doesn’t seem scary to me either, usually people vote for a color, not for a person or his career. Unless they are the highest positions, such as the president of the municipality, the governor or the president of the republic.
On the other hand, he agrees with Tatiana Cloutier and he also disapproves of people voting for election advisers. Since this is a very specialized job, for which they must compete for knowledge or experience, and not for public recognition. He says his expertise is currently being reviewed by specialized experts. Now I ask myself: what if the president chooses 20 of them, the Chamber of Deputies 10, the senators another 10 and the INE another 10…they can’t be equally qualified by a panel of experts and then go to a popular vote? .
I’m almost ready to invite you to spend Big Brother. Because the really difficult thing is that they are absolutely impartial. Not even bringing them back from Mars. but definitely for those who say that “INE was not touched” let me remind you that they touched for a long time. If not for him, he would still be called IFE.
And here is the link to download the Capsule https://spaces.hightail.com/receive/JrzrzuVibG
FERNANDA TAPIA
[email protected]
@TAPIAFERNANDA
BUDDY
Source: Heraldo De Mexico
Ray Bly is an accomplished journalist in the field of Automobile. He currently works as a writer at 24 news breaker. With a deep understanding of the Automotive industry and a talent for uncovering the latest developments, Ray’s writing provides readers with insightful and informative coverage of the latest news and trends in the field.