“No.2” is amazing for a strong organization.5 traits of a good manager that are actually more important than leaders

Not only in Japan, there is a deep-rooted desire that one leader can change the world.

Whether in politics or business, a charismatic leader will emerge who will show us the direction in an easy-to-understand manner, and will rescue us from this situation—the so-called “leader long-awaited theory.” Breaking through blockages, especially in times of recession or when change is needed, requires a strong leader.

But can one leader really make a big difference?

who makes the movement

There is an interesting presentation at TED held in 2010. Derek Shivers’ “How to Start a Social Movement”. It’s a presentation that became a hot topic, so many of you may have seen it.

For those of you who don’t know, let me give you an overview.

Mr. Shivers will start the presentation while showing a video of about 3 minutes.

Crowds of people are sitting on the slopes of the grass. Suddenly, a shirtless man starts dancing strangely. At first he is alone, but after a while another man joins in and starts dancing. One person who was watching it joined the dance circle, and now there are three people.

After a while, a group of people joined together. With this as a trigger, people will join the dance. We’ve crossed the so-called tipping point.

Joining the dance is no longer strange. As the number of participants increases, it becomes embarrassing not to participate in the dance, and the number of participants continues to increase. The video is only about three minutes long, but the essence of how the movement spreads is condensed here.

As the video ends, Shivers says:

“This movement started because one shirtless guy started doing weird dances. It’s true.

However, one person is not a leader in the first place. This opportunity became a big movement because there were 2nd and 3rd followers. It’s the second and third followers that turn one weirdo into a leader. Without them there would have been no movement.

However, only the leader is always evaluated. Leaders are overrated.”

This is not limited to social movements. There are examples that show the importance of No. 2 in business as well. Soichiro Honda, who was the founder and engineer of Honda, and Takeo Fujisawa, who supported it from the management side, are a very famous combination. The same goes for Sony founders Masaru Ibuka and Akio Morita.

In the world of business, No.2 and No.3 are people called “managers.”. In creating a strong organization, perhaps even more important than the leader, are the “second and third followers.”

So today, we’re going to talk about what makes a “second- and third-follower” manager, and how you can become one.

How is it different from leadership?

There are many people in the world who are called “managers”. According to the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare’s Basic Survey on Employment Structure, it is estimated that there are 200,000 to 300,000 managers in companies with 100 or more employees. Similarly, the Basic Survey on Wage Structure estimates that the number is 3 million, which is 10 times that figure. It’s a pretty big gap, but there are definitely a lot of managers out there anyway.

With so many managers, I don’t hear many young people saying they want to be managers. It’s just my personal opinion, but the word “leader” sounds better than the word manager, and it’s easy to attract attention as a hero/heroine, so I think it’s easy to become an object of admiration.

Now for the question. In the first place, “leadership” necessary for leaders and “management skills” necessary for managers. can you explain the difference between the two? Before we get to the point, let’s get this point out of the way.

‘Leadership’ has existed since ancient Greece

The term “leadership” dates back to ancient Greece. Until modern times, it was the established theory that leadership was an innate ability that people were born with.

In the late 1960s and 1970s, however, scholar John Adair overturned the conventional wisdom.Leadership can be acquired by everyone through training and experienceHe argued that he presented “Seven Practical Actions for Leaders”.

Seven Practical Actions for Leaders

“Management” by Drucker

On the other hand, “management” is said to be a concept created by Peter Drucker, who is well known in Japan as a master of business administration. In his books Modern Management (published 1954) and Management (published 1973), Drucker referred to management as “The tools, functions, and institutions that make an organization successful”, and presented the “five jobs of a manager” responsible for management.

5 jobs of a manager

Comparing Drucker’s “Five Jobs for Managers” with Adair’s “Seven Practical Behaviors for Leaders” reveals many similarities (see chart below).

Comparison of Drucker's

This is what it means. Until the middle of the 20th century, there was only the concept of leadership, and leadership was thought to be “innate.” However, in the latter half of the 20th century, Drucker created the concept of “management,” and Adair overturned conventional wisdom by saying, “Leadership can be acquired after birth.”

This is why there are so many similarities between management and leadership.In business, it’s pretty much the same thing..

Why managers are underrated

Next, let’s also compare “leaders” and “managers,” people who specifically implement leadership and management.

A leader is often used to mean a person who demonstrates leadership. The word “leader” has a positive image because of the image of drawing a vision and guiding people.

But what about one manager? Management is translated as “Management” and “Management”, but in many cases Manager is translated as “Management position”. Perhaps because of this, many people have an image of managers as “managers,” those who manage the actions of their members without acting themselves.

in this way,Although “management” and “leadership” are defined as similar actions, the images that are recalled by “managers” and “leaders” who carry them out are different..

Managers, who should be valued as leaders, are undervalued as “managers only”, which is probably one of the reasons why managers are less popular.

Don’t be a manager based on seniority or performance

I wrote that “managers are underrated”, but if you look around the world, it’s true that there are many “bad managers” who deserve to be underrated.

What is the cause of mass production of “bad managers”? In some cases, the cause lies with the individual, but in many cases, the cause lies with the company (manager). A typical pattern is:

  • Appoint someone with a lot of experience as a manager
  • Make high performers managers

Many Japanese companies have been making managers based on seniority and performance. So far this may have worked, butBy making such people managers, in recent years there has been a crack in the organization..

Source: BusinessInsider

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest

Volkswagen Golf, some sketches “anticipate” restyling January 20, 2024 0

Restyling of Volkswagen Golf will be presented in a few days. Sharing some teasers, and recently at CES 2024 in Las Vegas even...

Xiaomi SU7, the debut of the electric car is approaching. Spy photo November 23, 2023 8

Xiaomi SU7 will be the first model from the electronics giant to venture into the electric vehicle sector. Thanks to a series of...