Who benefits from the death of Vladlen Tatarsky? The main versions of the murder of the Russian military correspondent

Russia’s National Counter-Terrorism Committee accused the Ukrainian special services of organizing the murder of military blogger Vladlen Tatarsky (Maxim Fomin). They believe that the operation was carried out in collaboration with supporters of Alexei Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation. It should be noted that the National Anti-Terrorism Committee is not an investigative body, but only performs the functions of coordinating counter-terrorism activities carried out by federal executive authorities.

In turn, Dmitry Peskov, the press secretary of Russian President Vladimir Putin, has already managed to declare that Tatarsky died in a terrorist attack, which could be behind the “Kiev regime”.

“There is evidence that the Ukrainian intelligence services may have had a hand in the planning of this terrorist attack. Russia is facing the Kiev regime, which has been behind the killings of people for many years, starting in 2014, and supporting terrorist activities.”

Important

Putin did not personally react to the incident. The Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, has already managed to urge the Russians to report any ties with Ukraine. According to him, anyone who receives funds from Ukraine is likely to be a traitor.

Ukrainian authorities confirmed that the military commander Tatarsky in St. He denies anything about his death in St. Petersburg. President Volodymyr Zelensky said that everything that happens there must be taken care of by Russia itself.

The President said, “I don’t think about what happened in St. Petersburg or Moscow. Russia should think about it. I think about our country.”

Focus He collected the most likely versions of why there was a powerful explosion at the Yevgeny Prigozhin’s Street food bar cafe in the very center of St.

The murder of Vladlen Tatarsky: “The Ukrainian trail”

The murder of Vladlen Tatarsky does not give Ukraine any advantage in protecting and liberating its lands from Russian occupation. Another Russian propagandist also had no significant influence in Ukraine. Therefore, the organization of such an event on his own behalf seems suspicious. But do not forget about the transfer of the war to the territory of the Russian Federation. In early March 2023, Yevgeny Prigozhin officially announced that the Ukrainian Armed Forces had a high probability of attacking Bryansk. According to him, he would prefer negotiations at the table.

“It is highly likely that the Ukrainian Armed Forces will launch a series of counterattack operations in mid-April. It is likely that one of the attacks will be in the city area, most likely in our region. Belgorod,” said Prigozhin.

Kirill Budanov, head of the Main Directorate of Intelligence of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, said that there are agents in Putin’s circle who are not opposed to cooperation with Ukraine. The GUR explained that the Russian elite only cares about their own security and business, not internal changes in Russia. At the same time, news about “bavovna”, “hypersound” and “air defense work” has already become commonplace in many Russian cities.

“We can not say anything, but there are clear signs of acts of sabotage and sabotage on the territory of the Russian Federation that benefit Ukraine. Look, in early March there was an explosion on the territory of the military contingent of Russia. The FSB in Rostov, now in St. Petersburg “There’s a boom. There’s only one city left where nothing resonates yet – this is Moscow.” Focus political scientist Viktor Nebozhenko.

In particular, prominent inspector Hristo Grozev of Bellingcat said that Tatarsky’s murder could be both a Ukrainian special operation and a false flag operation by Russian special services to reinforce pro-war sentiments in Russia.

The terrorist attack in St. Petersburg and the struggle of the Kremlin towers

Traditionally, in “decision-making centers”, that is, Moscow or St. High-profile and resounding events in St. Petersburg are associated with the legendary battles of the “Kremlin towers”. Vladlen Tatarsky was not a political figure, but was part of the close circle of Wagner PMC and the founder of the troll factory Yevgeny Prigozhin.

“Today Prigozhin has an open conflict with the Russian Ministry of Defense, has gained a certain political weight and is becoming more and more influential. It can be assumed that this is a kind of mafia signal to Prigozhin, one of the Russian special services. After all, a blogger close to him in his own institution murder has been committed,” he says. Focus political scientist Petr Oleshchuk.

According to Oleshchuk, the version that the murder was organized by the Ukrainian special services together with Navalny’s supporters seems ludicrous to say the least.

“In Russia, untouched by the war as far as Ukraine, even public actions are an effective tool for internal competition. There are Russian nationalist radicals against Putin and the Ozero cooperative. There are tough reckonings. Political analyst Alexander Kochetkov, turbopatriots – for example, Strelkov and Prigozhin talk about each other. Read what you wrote,” he said.

Tatarsky’s Death – information campaign

An old but effective technique of media and propaganda is to draw public attention from an existing problem to a new one. Today, Russia is on the verge of a systemic crisis, the authorities have already officially admitted that the country’s economy is expected to decline. Military operations in Ukraine are not successful, new “bavovny” are occurring every day on the territory of the Russian Federation, and in government offices they are waiting for the start of the Ukrainian counteroffensive. Perhaps the authorities want to divert Russian attention from the backlog of problems, through the murder of Tatarsky. And from the words of Medvedev about the treacherous nature of cooperation with the Ukrainians, it can be concluded that a “witch hunt” has begun.

Tatarsky’s death and elections for Putin

The new is the forgotten old. In 2024, presidential elections will be held in Russia. Despite Putin’s high grade presented to him by sociology companies, the leader should go to the polls with a clear idea. The struggle against “Nazism” and NATO does not yield results – the alliance has expanded to the borders of Russia, and the existence of “Ukrainian Nazis” has already been denied by the same Prigozhin. The preservation of history, faith and kinship values ​​has always been a weighty argument for Russia, but that shouldn’t be enough for Putin’s election campaign. Therefore, the basis for Russia’s struggle against an external enemy that only Putin can defeat is now being prepared.

According to Viktor Nebozhenko, St. Petersburg is a kind of explosion

In 2000, a sugar-like mixture was found in blast areas of residential buildings in Russia, which eventually turned out to be loose TNT.

“>”candy boom”mobilizing the population and demonstrating the need for more active action on the front. That is, to show that the war is already on Russian soil.

Important

“For a long time, the Russian people were taught that the war was far away. In 1945, Stalin said that the enemy would be quickly defeated by small forces on their own soil. And today, the echoes of the war are already being heard. The territory of the Russian Federation,” he says. Focus nebozhenko.

In his opinion, Tatarsky’s death puts him on the same level as Daria Dugina, but in no way makes them “holy sacrifices”.

“There is a problem with sanctity in modern Russia, the only thing sacred is Putin himself, who puts himself above the state. Before that, only Stalin allowed him, neither Khrushchev, Brezhnev nor Yeltsin allowed it,” he explains. nebozhenko.

He suggests that conclusions can be drawn about the propaganda nature of the murder of Vladlen Tatarsky from his funeral. This will be demonstrated by their scale and the involvement of authorities.

Another version of the murder of Vladlen Tatarsky – criminal shows

Vladlen Tatarsky, then Maxim Fomin, had a criminal background. He was sentenced to 12 years in prison for bank robbery in 2011. He did his duty in Gorlovka, but a year later he managed to arrange an escape – in 2012, hostilities began in the Donbass. Then Tatarsky joined the ranks of the so-called “DPR militia” and personally received a pardon from Alexander Zakharchenko. It can be assumed that someone from Tatarsky’s former circle decided to settle accounts with him.