There are many Doubts about whether robots can replace humans in various jobs and possibly some ultrasound specialists may be concerned because research has shown that artificial intelligence (AI) could be more accurate in analyzing and diagnosing heart function than echocardiograms.
Researchers from the Cedars Sinai Medical Center say that artificial intelligence is more accurate in analyzing and diagnosing the work of the heart than artificial intelligence. echocardiograms performed by ultrasound specialists.
These indicative results come from first-of-its-kind, blinded, randomized clinical trial investigating the use of AI in cardiologyled by researchers from the Smidt Heart Institute and Cedars-Sinai’s Department of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.
” The results are of direct relevance to patients undergoing cardiac imaging.as well as broader implications for the field of cardiac imaging,” said cardiologist David Ouyang, MD, principal investigator of the clinical trial and lead author of the study. “This study offers compelling evidence that using AI in this new way can improve the quality and efficiency of echocardiogram imaging for many patients.”
In 2020, researchers at the Smidt Heart Institute and Stanford University developed one of the first artificial intelligence technologies for assessing the work of the heartin particular, left ventricular ejection fraction, a key cardiac measurement used in diagnosing cardiac function. Their study was also published in the journal Nature.
Based on these results, a new study assessed whether AI was more accurate in evaluating 3495 transthoracic echocardiogram studies. a comparison of the initial assessment performed by an AI or an ultrasound specialist, also known as an ultrasound specialist.
Comparison results
cardiologists were more likely to agree with the initial assessment of IS and they corrected only 16.8% of the original estimates made by the AI.
cardiologists corrected 27.2% of grades initials made ultrasound.
clinicians could not distinguish which assessments were performed by AI and which by ultrasound specialists.. AI has helped save time for cardiologists and ultrasound specialists.
“We asked our cardiologists to guess if the preliminary interpretation was made by artificial intelligence or by an ultrasound specialist, and it turned out that they couldn’t tell the difference,” Ouyang said. “This indicates the high performance of the AI algorithm., as well as perfect integration into clinical software. We think all of this bodes well for future AI research in this area.”
Hope, says Ouyang, save doctors time and minimize the most tedious parts of the workflow images of the heart. However, the cardiologist remains the expert who ultimately decides on the results of the AI model.
Source: La Opinion
Ashley Fitzgerald is an accomplished journalist in the field of technology. She currently works as a writer at 24 news breaker. With a deep understanding of the latest technology developments, Ashley’s writing provides readers with insightful analysis and unique perspectives on the industry.